Bard PowerPort
Wallace Miller is not currently accepting Bard Powerport cases. However, that does not mean you don’t have a legal claim. We recommend searching for attorneys and law firms that focus on Bard Powerport lawsuits.Â
Online directories like FindLaw or Martindale can help with finding qualified legal professionals, or you can contact your local Bar Association for help in your area.Â
Overview
Injury: Complications from port catheter devices
Defendant:Â Bard Access Systems, Inc.; C.R. Bard, Inc.; and Becton, Dickinson and Company
Practice:Â Mass Tort
Latest Update: August 2023 — On August 8, 2023, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) officially established a multidistrict litigation (MDL) for Bard PowerPort cases in Arizona federal court. For the 10 pending actions against Bard and lawsuits filed in the future, the consolidation will aid attorneys in investigating the facts common to all cases, make the process more convenient for parties and witnesses, and increase the efficiency of the litigation.Â
The District of Arizona was selected for the nationwide litigation because defendant Bard Access Systems has a significant business presence in that district. As a result, many relevant witnesses may be located in the area.Â
The JPML selected the Honorable David G. Campbell to oversee the litigation. Judge Campbell is also presiding over litigation regarding IVC Filters product liability (MDL No. 2641) which involves another medical device manufactured by Bard.
Case Team
PARTNER
Nicholas P. Kelly
CONTACT ATTORNEY
Kristina J. Anderson
CONTACT PARALEGAL
Cyrus Finegan
PARALEGAL
Gabriela Lopez
Can Wallace Miller help me with my Bard PowerPort claim?
Wallace Miller is not currently accepting Bard PowerPort cases. However, that does not mean you don’t have a legal claim. We recommend searching for attorneys and law firms that focus on Bard PowerPort lawsuits.Â
Online directories like FindLaw or Martindale can help with finding qualified legal professionals, or you can contact your local Bar Association for help in your area.Â
Plaintiffs bring cases against manufacturers of port catheter devices
Wallace Miller is investigating cases against the Bard PowerPort medical device manufacturers. According to recent lawsuits, these catheter port devices can cause a range of serious complications and injuries. The port catheter devices have been found to fracture and migrate after implant, causing injuries including infections, blood clots, and vascular perforation.
Injury
What is the Bard PowerPort device?
The Bard PowerPort Implantable Port is an implanted medical catheter device that makes it easier for patients to receive repeated injections into the bloodstream. Also called an Injection Port, Port-a-Catheter, and Port-a-Cath, it allows for intravenous (or IV) delivery of fluids, medication, and nutrition without requiring the reinsertion of an IV for every injection.Â
Port catheter devices like these are implanted under the skin when a patient’s medical team needs repeated access to the vascular system. Also called the circulatory system, the vascular system comprises vessels, like veins and arteries, that carry blood and lymph through the body.Â
A port catheter device comprises two main elements: the injection port and the catheter. The injection port, or reservoir, is the part of the device where the needle is inserted to deliver medication. In the image above, the port is the triangular purple attachment.Â
The catheter is a small flexible tube attached to the port. Most often made of polyurethane, it runs from the port into a blood vessel. Medication, fluids, or nutrition travel from the injection port through the catheter and into the bloodstream.Â
A doctor administers an injection via the patient’s port-a-cath. Photograph by Rhonda Baer for the National Cancer Institute.
Why is the PowerPort used?
Devices like the Bard PowerPort are used when a patient’s medical team needs regular access to the vascular system. In cases like these, a patient may need many injections, and it would be inconvenient, painful, or time-consuming to reinsert an IV line every time an injection was necessary.Â
Port catheter device implants are very common in the U.S., with more than 300,000 implants of port devices in the country every year. They are most often used for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment and are also often used for those with severe autoimmune disorders.Â
What complications are associated with Bard PowerPort devices?
The PowerPort lawsuits brought by plaintiffs hold that the flexible catheter tube in the device was manufactured with a substance called barium sulfate. When exposed to the bloodstream, barium sulfate has been shown to cause the surface of the catheter to degrade. Â
The loss of barium sulfate particles from the catheter surface can lead to microfractures, fissures, and alterations to the tube structure. These, in turn, can cause more significant fractures, infections, blood clots, and other injuries.Â
The vascular system carries blood and lymph through the body. Photograph by Pixabay.
Injuries linked to the defective PowerPort
The PowerPort litigations filed so far have cited several serious health issues due to the use of the device. These injuries include:Â
Catheter fracture
Patients have reported breakage and fracture of the catheter tube due to issues with the flexible material. The material’s brittleness means that parts may break off and lodge in the vascular system, causing significant medical complications.Â
PowerPort infection
When barium sulfate particles are lost from the surface of the catheter, the fractures and degradation make it possible for bacteria to enter and grow at the site of the port. If left untreated, this can lead to serious infections or sepsis for the patient. Â
PowerPort migration
Due to the degradation of the catheter tube inserted into the blood vessel, the catheter can shift from its original placement. This can cause potential cardiac issues, including perforation and infection.Â
Blood clots
The use of faulty catheter tube devices has been linked to the development of blood clots or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). These can be life-threatening.Â
Damage to the vascular system
The migration and fracture of the catheter tube can cause the perforation of veins, tissues, and blood vessels when material elements shift from their original location.
Plaintiff & Defendant
Bard PowerPort lawsuits
Multiple lawsuits against the manufacturers of the PowerPort devices have been filed alleging harm caused by the catheter port devices.Â
The plaintiffs claim that the defendants knew or should have known their product was dangerous. They also allege that Bard intentionally misled patients and medical professionals by claiming the PowerPort was safe. By knowingly putting a dangerous product on the market and failing to warn consumers about the potential risks, plaintiffs claim that Bard caused significant harm to users of its product.Â
Who is eligible to file a Bard PowerPort lawsuit?
You may be eligible to file a lawsuit against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort device if you fit the following criteria:Â
- Have had a Bard PowerPort device implant;Â
- Dealt with medical complications due to issues from the device, including migration, fracture, or infection; andÂ
- Suffered significant injuries due to the use of the PowerPort device.Â
If you believe that you or a loved one may have a case against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort device, call Wallace Miller today at (312) 467-7362 or fill out our online questionnaire for a confidential and free consultation. Â
Filing a Bard PowerPort lawsuit
As part of filing a lawsuit against the Bard PowerPort device manufacturers, our PowerPort attorneys will gather evidence about your medical history and the injuries caused by the device. Then, our attorneys will work to establish the connection between the manufacturers’ production of a faulty device and the subsequent harm caused by the product.Â
Wallace Miller relies entirely on successful settlements to pay operation fees. This means that there is no out-of-pocket cost for our clients. If we can take on your PowerPort lawsuit, you will not incur any fee from our firm unless we win your case and procure a settlement. Â
Who are the defendants in the PowerPort litigations?
The defendants in the PowerPort lawsuit are Bard Access Systems, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiary and device manufacturer C.R. Bard, Inc., and their parent company, Becton, Dickinson and Company.Â
The defendants are market leaders of comparable medical devices. Their products account for more than 50% of sales of domestic implanted port devices. Â
Landscape
The history of the Bard PowerPort device
The Bard PowerPort device was first marketed in the year 2000. According to the lawsuits filed against the company, Bard soon began to receive adverse event reports (AERs) from healthcare professionals detailing serious injuries, including fractures, vascular perforation, hemorrhage, infection, and death.Â
Despite the numerous AERs it received, lawsuits allege that Bard did not warn consumers of the potential risk or move to change the materials in the device. These reports were also unavailable to the public due to the FDA’s Alternative Summary Reporting (ASR) program, which ran from 1997 to June 2019. Under this program, manufacturers were allowed to request exemptions, alternatives, and variances to reporting requirements, and reports filed were unavailable to the public or healthcare providers. Â
When this information became available in 2019, researchers found that 65% of the adverse events reported with catheter port devices were filed through ASR rather than the publicly available Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. Â
In 2020, a large study surveyed more than 90,000 patients who had received an implanted port device. The study found that within five years, injuries, including infections, arrhythmogenic and thromboembolic complications, and device fractures were very common. More than half of patients surveyed reported related complications, with a rate of 59.04% across all types of injury. Â
Timeline
August 2023
JPML officially establishes multidistrict litigation in Arizona federal court.
On August 8, 2023, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) officially established a multidistrict litigation (MDL) for Bard PowerPort cases in Arizona federal court. For the 10 pending actions against Bard and lawsuits filed in the future, the consolidation will aid attorneys in investigating the facts common to all cases, make the process more convenient for parties and witnesses, and increase the efficiency of the litigation.Â
The District of Arizona was selected for the nationwide litigation because defendant Bard Access Systems has a significant business presence in that district. As a result, many relevant witnesses may be located in the area.Â
The JPML selected the Honorable David G. Campbell to oversee the litigation. Judge Campbell is also presiding over litigation regarding IVC Filters product liability (MDL No. 2641) which involves another medical device manufactured by Bard.Â
June 2023
A motion to consolidate Bard PowerPort lawsuits has been filed.
As of June 2023, there are about 10 individual lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the catheter port device. A motion to consolidate these cases was filed on June 12, requesting that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidate the lawsuits. If the multidistrict litigation goes forward, it will be consolidated in the Western District Court of Missouri under the Honorable Stephen R. Bough. Â
Due to the widespread use of catheter port devices in the U.S. and the high rate of injury amongst users, it is possible that the multidistrict litigation could eventually involve thousands or even tens of thousands of cases.Â
What is a multidistrict litigation?Â
In cases where many lawsuits are filed against the same defendants, those cases can be brought together into a multidistrict litigation, or MDL. Instead of investigating the circumstances of each case separately, MDLs allow plaintiffs, defendants, and courts to gather information on issues shared by all the cases at once.Â
A judge will oversee the MDL process in a federal district court. Under the judge’s supervision, the plaintiffs’ attorneys will file a joint complaint. Then, the defendants will file an answer. The attorneys on both sides will gather information and conduct pretrial processes that apply to all cases.Â
Throughout this process, the case of each individual plaintiff remains separate. If the attorneys don’t reach a settlement that applies to all cases, the litigations may be sent back to their individual district courts to be tried.Â
